Thursday, October 19, 2023

Testimony Opposing Rezoning of Pickett Mountain Land for Metal Mining

 


I was born and grew up in Portage Lake near the Bald Mountain site considered for a mine like the one being proposed at Pickett Mountain. For more than a decade, I have been researching risks and benefits of metallic mineral mining and testifying in opposition to plans that pose unacceptable risks to the environment in Maine’s wet climate. In 3 minutes, I can’t talk about all the worries I have about this proposed mine, so I will focus on threats to waters surrounding the site.

Wolfden’s application lists numerous water bodies there. Recreational water areas within 3 miles of the Project Area include 1 lake, 4 ponds, and a river. Inside the Project Area are 29 wetlands, 22 watercourses, 8 vernal pools and 2 potential vernal pools. Mine infrastructure, the application says, will be sited at least 75 feet away from wetlands, streams, and vernal pools to avoid direct impacts to these resources during construction and mine operations. Within 3 miles is about the distance of a 1-hour walk even for me at 85. And 75 feet is about the length of my small backyard. Since water always flows downward with the force of gravity, how can those distances possibly prevent toxic pollution from reaching all that water? Wolfden promises the project’s water treatment approach will return clean, treated water back to the environment and  maintain current water quality within the project area and downgradient water bodies.1

I have looked for and never found an example of a metallic mineral mine anywhere in the world that lived up to promises like that. At every forum on the subject I have attended over these years, I asked for an example of a mine that has not polluted surrounding waters with toxic chemicals. Every example given proves to be false when I follow up with research. Ann Maest in pre-filed testimony says the ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis Wolfden proposes “can in theory produce high-quality effluent.” The phrase “in theory” is important because, as she goes on to say, “Wolfden provides no example of a comparable mine that accomplishes the levels required.”2

If I had more time, I would talk about false promises made for economic and community benefits. Instead, I will close with these thoughts: metallic mine closures (Wolfden expects10-15 years for this one) leave communities economically, socially, and environmentally depressed.3 This kind of mining is among the dirtiest industries in the world.4  There has never been such a mine anywhere that lives up to promises of economic benefits and environmental safety. Please, do not rezone this area for a metallic mineral mine unless or until the technology and the social and political will can succeed in preventing toxic contamination of our waterways. Documentary sources are enclosed that support my opinions if you need them.

Works Cited with some notes

1.     1.  “Pickett Mountain Mine Rezoning Application, ZP 779A – Wolfden Mt. Chase LLC.” Land Use Planning Commission. October 12, 2023.                           https://www.maine.gov/dacf/lupc/projects/wolfden/wolfden_rezoning.html

2.      2. Ann Maest. “VII. Water Balance,” pp 29 ff. https://www.maine.gov/dacf/lupc/projects/wolfden/pre-filed-testimony/ZP779A_Intervenor2_PreFiledTestimony-PartII.pdf

3.     3.  Blocking Destructive Mining.” Sierra Club. https://www.sierraclub.org/wisconsin/issues/mining  Mining “generally leads to brief spurts of inequitable economic growth followed by inevitable crashes and periods of depression.” Wisconsin “challenged the mining industry to give one example of a metallic sulfide mine that had been safely operated and closed without polluting the environment. Predictably, the industry has failed to identify a single example to this day.” “In a 1995 report, Wisconsin’s DNR confirmed the inherent destructive nature of mining, writing: “There are no ideal metallic mineral mining sites which can be pointed to as the model approach in preventing acidic drainage industry-wide.” In 2023, these statements still apply.

4.     4.  C. Thomas.  “Global Study Reveals Extensive Impact of Metal Mining Contamination on Rivers and Floodplains.” University of Lincoln. 22 September 2023. https://news.lincoln.ac.uk/2023/09/22/global-study-reveals-extensive-impact-of-metal-mining-contamination-on-rivers-and-floodplains/  “A groundbreaking study, published today in Science, has provided new insights into the extensive impact of metal mining contamination on rivers and floodplains across the world, with an estimated 23 million people believed to be affected by potentially dangerous concentrations of toxic waste.”

      "Dirty Metals.”Earth Works. June 16, 2004. https://earthworks.org/resources/dirty_metals/  “This report will show you what lies behind that stupendous lode of copper and tantalum, gold and platinum. We’ll explain how the mining of these and other metals damages landscapes, pollutes water, and poisons people. We’ll show you why modern, industrial mining is one of the world’s most destructive industries.”

Video LUPC mining hearings in Millinocket available at

https://www.youtube.com/@mainedeptofagriculturecons3702/streams 
            My testimony is in the last video (1st day of testimony) at 9:46.