- ECONOMIC JUSTICE FOR 99%
- REMOVING MONEY INFLUENCE FROM POLITICS
- ENDING POVERTY; IT THREATENS PEACE AND NATIONAL-SECURITY
- ENDING CORPORATE GREED
- ENDING CORPORATE PERSONHOOD
- ENDING CORPORATE WELFARE
- FAIR-SHARE TAXES
- USING A CREDIT UNION INSTEAD OF A BIG BANK
- REMEMBERING “THE LOVE OF MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL”
- BUILDING “THE
PEACABLE KINGDOM
Why is that so hard to understand? Support Occupy Wall Street.
UPDATE 12-3-2011
Visit again for further updates.
UPDATE 12-3-2011
After I posted the list above, We formed our own Occupy Aroostook. As with other Occupy groups, our local group is wrestling with the issue of stated goals for the Occupy movement. Having arrived at a consensus opinion about the need for a trifold brochure to explain what we are about to community and media who keep asking, I drafted one and sent it around to our email list for comments and suggestions. For purposes of discussion, the draft included the following list garnered from discussions at assembly . Although there is no consensus about most of the items on the list, there are passionate loyalties among some for or against particular items.
GOALS
Get money out of politics. Reform campaign funding.
Stop congressional insider trading.
Reduce deficit via fair-share taxes for the rich and stop wars.
Reform banking: restore Glass-Steagall Act.
Stop corporate welfare, too-big-to-fail companies, government subsidies that support big profits.
Better education for a better world: publicly funded K through Ph.D., stop public funding of private for-profit schools, forgive student loans.
Single-payer, universal health care.
Protect workers’ rights, and support small-business prosperity.
I did get disagreement as expected, and I responded with the following message.
Thanks for input on the OA trifold draft. This is an important part of the process. I would like to have more.
I’m going to speak as myself here and not for Occupy Aroostook; I want to express some opinions that some of you will likely disagree with. That’s OK; give me your argument for disagreeing.
First, the brochure itself—do we need one? As I read the consensus of those attending Assembly, yes we do. I agree with that. We need to explain ourselves to the larger community in some format(s) more than what we can communicate with signs at marches. I think we are not in agreement about what such communication should contain. So, I decided to draft a brochure to use as a basis for discussion. I tried to put in it all the issues I have heard discussed about what we should stand for. I hope and assume there will be revisions, deletions, replacements, expansions, etc. that will happen as we come to better understand the issues and grow our opinions about them. I hope we never stop keeping an open mind to new evidence or knowledge that might require us to change our minds, even after we agree on a brochure, or whatever else we decide to do.
Second, the list of goals—do we need one? I don’t think we have consensus about that in assembly, but the issue keeps coming up in the Occupy movement nationally and locally from marchers and non-marchers and from media. Every time I have spoken to the media, they ask the question in one form or another. My preferred list would be one umbrella term, like “social justice,” which, to me, captures a sense of all the issues we are concerned about. Unfortunately, that term is too loaded, ie. socialism, to be practical and too abstract to be useful. My next preference would be simply what we have been using “Economic & Political Justice.” But that, too, doesn’t satisfy the media, nor the public’s legitimate right (we are in their faces every week) to know more specifically what we are about. I can think of no other mechanism to let them know in a brief format other than a list. Do any of you out there have ideas for how to do this? Perhaps we should call such a list “Some Issues of Concern,” since I don’t believe we are ready to declare specific goals that we can achieve consensus about.
Third, the content of the list. For my ideal preferences, even the list suggested by one of you (economic justice, money out of politics, corporations are not people) is too long. But for the purposes of communicating to the public what we are about, 3 items is too short, too limiting. I would, at this point in my thinking, try to boycott any list that does not include concerns about education and health care. These issues are too basic to the cause of economic justice to ignore in such a list. I am open to a good argument against including them; I haven’t heard that argument yet.
Fourth, the forgiveness of student loans that some object to. I’ve been on the fence about that. So I went looking for good arguments that would allow me to fall over to the side of forgiveness as part of a more-comprehensive solution to the whole problem of funding education, such as “universal education for life,” in multiple senses of for life. I’m still doing research, but for now, here are a some arguments persuasive to me: for an economic view: http://www.forgivestudentloandebt.com/content/proposal; for a moral view: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/guest-voices/post/forgive-us-our-student-loan-debt/2011/11/28/gIQAFT564N_blog.html; for comment on the moral view: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/29/blogger-manages-to-get-pr_n_1119214.html.
Please feel free to join or continue in this conversation about a list of Occupy concerns: occupyaroostook@gmail.com;
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Occupy-Aroostook/312067425476344; http://occupyaroostook.wordpress.com/ or any Occupy facebook page or website. Or draft your own list and submit it for discussion. Be peaceful. Be respectful. Visit again for further updates.
